Sheila: It has been argued that using computer technology to add color to a movie originally filmed in black and white damages the integrity of the original film. But no one argues that we should not base a movie on a novel or a short story because doing so would erode the value of the book or story. The film adaptation of the written work is a new work that stands on its own. Judgments of it do not reflect on the original. Similarly, the colorized film is a new work distinct from the original and should be judged on its own merit. It does not damage the integrity of the original black-and-white film.
Sheila's argument uses which one of the following techniques of argumentation?
Select an option, then click Submit answer.
-
○
It appeals to an analogy between similar cases.
-
○
It offers a counterexample to a general principle.
-
○
It appeals to popular opinion on the matter at issue.
-
○
It distinguishes facts from value judgments.
-
○
It draws an inference from a general principle and a set of facts.
is that the general principle to which it alludes – namely, that works of art are distinct entities – is never stated but rather is inferable (by us) from Sheila’s two analogous cases.