LSAT-Section-3-Analytical-Reasoning Section Three : Analytical Reasoning

Loading demo links...

Showing 4–6 of 60 questions

Question 4

Estelle states: When I went fishing the other day, every fish that I caught was a salmon, and every salmon I saw I caught.

Of the following statements listed below, which one can be concluded from the observations of Estelle?

Select an option, then click Submit answer.

  • Salmon was the only fish that Estelle saw while she was fishing.

  • While Estelle was fishing, no other fish were caught by her.

  • In the area that Estelle fished, there were no other fish.

  • All of the fish that Estelle saw she caught.

  • Estelle did not see any other fish while she was fishing.

Question 5

Either protesters must have restrictions placed on them, or particular revolutionary issues that arise in society will be used to destroy the country. Because allowing the occurrence of the revolutionary outcome is out of the question, we must restrict protestors.

The above conclusion is unsteady due to the fact that:

Select an option, then click Submit answer.

  • protestors do not in reality want to demolish the country

  • There is too much emphasis placed on the importance of protesting

  • An accommodation is failed to be considered between both alternatives

  • The reasons for protesting has not been defined

  • protestors are, in truth, a real threat to the country's survival.

Question 6

The quarterly food inspection, performed by the local health team observes the customer reactions to fast food restaurants and family dining restaurants. However; during each inspection they discover that there are more reports of food poisoning found in the family dining restaurants than in the fast food restaurants.

Of the following statements, which one best clarifies the apparent paradox?

Select an option, then click Submit answer.

  • Customers are most likely to connect the illness they've experienced to their most recent meal if the illness has suddenly struck all of the people they ate with.

  • Customers complain less about the food poisoning they experience in fast food restaurants, because they expect it.

  • More people choose fast food restaurants over family dining restaurants.

  • Food poisoning cases are not related to the time customers ate at the family dining restaurants, or the number of people who all ate the same meal.

  • The family dining restaurants microwaves certain food items instead of cooking them on the stove.