SY0-701 Dumps Questions: Which Three Attacks Exploit Human Behavior? (choose three.)

The CompTIA Security+ (SY0-701) Certification Exam is a globally recognized, vendor-neutral credential for IT professionals, validating foundational cybersecurity skills in threat detection, risk management, and security operations. A key exam question, “Which three attacks exploit human behavior? (choose three.),” identifies phishing, social engineering, and pretexting as primary social engineering attacks that manipulate human psychology to bypass technical defenses. This topic is tested within Domain 1: General Security Concepts (12%) and Domain 2: Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations (22%), covering social engineering techniques, attack vectors, and mitigation strategies, essential for roles like security analysts, network administrators, and IT auditors.

The SY0-701 exam, lasting 90 minutes with up to 90 multiple-choice and performance-based questions, requires a passing score of 750 (on a 100–900 scale). Study4Pass is a premier resource for SY0-701 preparation, offering comprehensive study guides, practice exams, and hands-on labs tailored to the exam syllabus, available in PDF formats for flexible study. This article explores social engineering attacks, their pervasiveness, relevance to the SY0-701 exam, and strategic preparation tips using Study4Pass to excel in the CompTIA Security+ certification.

Introduction: The Human Element in Cybersecurity

The Weakest Link in Security

In 2025, cybersecurity threats are more sophisticated than ever, with global cybercrime damages projected to reach $10.5 trillion annually (Cybersecurity Ventures, 2023). While firewalls, encryption, and intrusion detection systems form robust technical defenses, the human element remains the most vulnerable link. Social engineering attacks exploit human behavior—trust, curiosity, or fear—to trick individuals into divulging sensitive information or performing actions that compromise security. The question, “Which three attacks exploit human behavior?” highlights phishing, social engineering (as a broad category), and pretexting, which manipulate psychological vulnerabilities to bypass even the strongest technical controls. For Security+ candidates, mastering these attacks is critical for protecting organizations and passing the exam, aligning with the SY0-701 focus on threat identification and mitigation.

For SY0-701 candidates, understanding social engineering is essential for threat management and exam success. Study4Pass provides detailed guides on attack vectors, supported by practice questions for comprehensive preparation.

Relevance to SY0-701 Exam

The SY0-701 exam tests social engineering in objectives like “Compare and contrast social engineering techniques” and “Analyze potential indicators associated with social engineering attacks.” Candidates must:

• Identify phishing, social engineering, and pretexting as attacks exploiting human behavior.
• Understand their mechanics, indicators, and mitigation strategies.
• Apply knowledge to scenarios involving threat detection, user training, or incident response.

The question about human-behavior attacks underscores their prevalence in cybersecurity. Study4Pass aligns its resources with these objectives, offering labs and practice exams that simulate real-world social engineering scenarios.

Social Engineering: The Master Manipulators

What is Social Engineering?

• Definition: Social engineering is the art of manipulating individuals into performing actions or divulging confidential information by exploiting psychological traits like trust, authority, or urgency.
• Characteristics:

o   Non-technical: Relies on human interaction rather than code or exploits.

o   Targeted: Customizes attacks based on victim profiles (e.g., employees, executives).

o   Multi-channel: Uses email, phone, in-person, or social media.

• Purpose:

o   Gain unauthorized access to systems or data.

o   Steal credentials, funds, or sensitive information.

o   Deploy malware or ransomware.

• Example: An attacker poses as an IT administrator, convincing an employee to reset their password, granting access to a corporate network.

Why Humans Are Vulnerable

• Psychological Triggers:

o   Trust: People assume authority figures or familiar contacts are legitimate.

o   Fear: Threats of consequences (e.g., account suspension) prompt action.

o   Curiosity: Enticing offers (e.g., free gifts) lure victims.

• Lack of Awareness: Employees untrained in recognizing social engineering are easy targets.
• Example: A user clicks a phishing link offering a free iPhone, installing malware due to curiosity and lack of training.

Importance in Cybersecurity

• Prevalence: 98% of cyberattacks involve social engineering elements (Verizon DBIR, 2023).
• Impact: Breaches cost organizations an average of $4.45 million (IBM, 2023).
• Compliance: Regulations like GDPR and HIPAA require employee training to mitigate human risks.
• Example: A hospital suffers a data breach after a nurse falls for a phishing email, exposing patient records.

SY0-701 Relevance: Questions may test social engineering mechanics. Study4Pass provides frameworks to understand these attacks.

Identifying Three Common Attacks Exploiting Human Behavior

The SY0-701 exam question asks for three attacks that exploit human behavior. The answers are:

Phishing

• Definition: Phishing is a social engineering attack where attackers send fraudulent emails, texts, or other messages that appear to come from a legitimate source, tricking users into providing sensitive information or clicking malicious links.
• Mechanics:

o   Delivery: Email, SMS, or social media mimicking trusted entities (e.g., banks, IT departments).

o   Tactics: Urgent requests (e.g., “Your account is locked”), fake login pages, or malware-laden attachments.

o   Goal: Steal credentials, install malware, or extract funds.

• Characteristics:

o   Mass-scale or targeted (spear phishing).

o   Often uses spoofed domains or logos.

o   Exploits trust and urgency.

• Example: An employee receives an email from “[email protected]” requesting login credentials, leading to a credential theft.
• Indicators:

o   Suspicious sender addresses (e.g., typos like “[email protected]”).

o   Generic greetings (e.g., “Dear User”).

o   Urgent or threatening language.

• SY0-701 Context: Tested in threat identification and email security scenarios.
• Study4Pass Support: Offers labs on identifying phishing emails in a simulated inbox.

Social Engineering (Broad Category)

• Definition: Social engineering encompasses a range of techniques that manipulate human psychology to gain unauthorized access or information, including phishing, pretexting, and others.
• Mechanics:

o   Techniques: Impersonation, elicitation, or baiting to exploit trust or fear.

o   Channels: Phone (vishing), in-person, email, or social media.

o   Goal: Obtain sensitive data, access systems, or influence behavior.

• Characteristics:

o   Highly customizable based on target research.

o   Relies on social cues (e.g., authority, familiarity).

o   Often combined with other attacks (e.g., phishing + pretexting).

• Example: An attacker calls an employee, posing as the CEO’s assistant, and requests urgent transfer of funds, exploiting authority and urgency.
• Indicators:

o   Unusual requests from “trusted” sources.

o   Pressure to bypass protocols.

o   Inconsistent contact details.

• SY0-701 Context: Tested as a broad category in social engineering scenarios.
• Study4Pass Support: Study4Pass Provides simulations of social engineering interactions (e.g., vishing calls).

Pretexting

• Definition: Pretexting is a social engineering attack where an attacker creates a fabricated scenario (pretext) to convince a target to provide information or perform an action.
• Mechanics:

o   Scenario: Impersonates a trusted figure (e.g., auditor, IT staff) with a believable backstory.

o   Tactics: Builds rapport, asks for “verification” data, or requests access.

o   Goal: Extract sensitive information or gain system access.

• Characteristics:

o   Requires research to craft convincing pretexts.

o   Often targets specific individuals (e.g., HR, finance).

o   Uses phone, email, or in-person interaction.

• Example: An attacker poses as an external auditor, requesting employee payroll data from HR, leading to a data breach.
• Indicators:

o   Requests for sensitive data without proper verification.

o   Stories that seem overly detailed or inconsistent.

o   Reluctance to follow standard procedures.

• SY0-701 Context: Tested in targeted attack and impersonation scenarios.
• Study4Pass Support: Offers labs on detecting pretexting through scenario analysis.

Exam Answer: Three attacks that exploit human behavior are phishing, social engineering, and pretexting. Study4Pass flashcards emphasize these attacks for quick recall.

Why These Attacks Are So Pervasive

Exploitation of Human Psychology

• Trust: People naturally trust familiar brands, colleagues, or authority figures.
• Urgency: Fear of consequences (e.g., account lockout) prompts rash actions.
• Curiosity: Offers like free gifts or promotions entice clicks.
• Example: A phishing email mimicking a bank exploits trust and urgency, tricking 30% of recipients into clicking (KnowBe4, 2023).

Low Technical Barriers

• Ease of Execution: Attackers need minimal skills to send phishing emails or make vishing calls.
• Tools: Phishing kits and spoofing software are widely available on the dark web.
• Cost: Attacks cost little compared to technical exploits like zero-days.
• Example: A $50 phishing kit enables an attacker to target thousands, yielding high ROI.

High Success Rates

• Statistics: 82% of data breaches involve human error (Verizon DBIR, 2023).
• Target Diversity: Attacks work on employees, executives, or consumers.
• Scalability: Mass phishing campaigns reach millions with one email blast.
• Example: A spear-phishing attack on a CEO yields $500,000 in fraudulent transfers.

Evolving Tactics

• Personalization: Spear phishing uses social media data for tailored attacks.
• Multi-Channel: Combines email, SMS, and phone for credibility.
• AI Enhancements: AI-generated emails mimic legitimate communication.
• Example: An AI-crafted phishing email impersonates a vendor, bypassing spam filters.

Lack of Awareness

• Training Gaps: Only 60% of organizations conduct regular security training (Gartner, 2023).
• Cultural Factors: Trusting or hierarchical cultures increase vulnerability.
• Example: A new employee, untrained in phishing detection, clicks a malicious link, infecting the network.

SY0-701 Relevance: Questions may explore attack pervasiveness. Study4Pass case studies highlight psychological and technical factors.

Relevance to CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Exam

Exam Objectives

• Domain 1: General Security Concepts (12%):

o   Objective: Understand social engineering techniques.

o   Relevance: Phishing, social engineering, pretexting definitions.

• Domain 2: Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations (22%):

o   Objective: Identify and mitigate attack vectors.

o   Relevance: Detecting and preventing social engineering attacks.

• Question Types:

o   Multiple-choice: Identify attacks exploiting human behavior.

o   Performance-based: Analyze phishing emails or pretexting scenarios.

o   Scenario-based: Recommend mitigation for social engineering incidents.

• Example Question: “Which three attacks exploit human behavior? (Choose three.)” (Answer: Phishing, social engineering, pretexting).

Real-World Applications

• Threat Detection: Identify phishing emails in a SOC environment.
• User Training: Develop programs to reduce social engineering risks.
• Incident Response: Mitigate breaches caused by human error.
• Example: A security analyst uses phishing indicators to block a campaign, saving $1 million in potential losses.

SY0-701 Focus

• Practical Skills: Tests hands-on threat analysis and mitigation.
• Human Factors: Emphasizes the role of user behavior in security.
• Career Relevance: Prepares candidates for analyst and auditor roles.

Study4Pass labs simulate social engineering scenarios, ensuring practical proficiency.

Mitigating Social Engineering Attacks (Briefly for Context)

User Training

• Method: Conduct regular security awareness training on phishing, pretexting, and social engineering.
• Example: Simulated phishing campaigns teach employees to spot suspicious emails.

Technical Controls

• Tools: Email filters, spam gateways, and multi-factor authentication (MFA).
• Example: An email gateway blocks 95% of phishing attempts before reaching users.

Policy Enforcement

• Measures: Strict verification for sensitive requests, data access controls.
• Example: A policy requires manager approval for fund transfers, thwarting pretexting.

Monitoring and Response

• Approach: Deploy SIEM systems and incident response plans.
• Example: A SIEM detects a phishing-related login attempt, triggering an account lockout.

Cultural Shift

• Goal: Foster a security-first mindset across the organization.
• Example: A company rewards employees for reporting suspicious emails, reducing incidents.
• SY0-701 Relevance: Questions may test mitigation strategies. Study4Pass guides cover these controls concisely.

Applying Social Engineering Knowledge to SY0-701 Prep

Scenario-Based Application

• Scenario: A company experiences a data breach after an employee falls for a phishing email impersonating the IT department.

o   Solution: Identify phishing, social engineering, and pretexting as potential attack methods, implement training, email filters, and MFA to mitigate risks.

o   Outcome: Reduced vulnerabilities, blocked future attacks, and enhanced security posture.

• SY0-701 Question: “Which attacks exploit human behavior in this scenario?” (Answer: Phishing, social engineering, pretexting).

Troubleshooting Social Engineering Incidents

• Issue 1: Phishing Emails Reaching Users:

o   Cause: Weak email filtering.

o   Solution: Deploy advanced spam gateways and train users.

o   Tool: Microsoft Defender for Office 365.

• Issue 2: Pretexting Success:

o   Cause: Lack of verification processes.

o   Solution: Implement strict request validation protocols.

• Issue 3: Repeated Social Engineering Breaches:

o   Cause: Insufficient training.

o   Solution: Conduct regular simulated attacks and awareness sessions.

• Example: A security team deploys a phishing simulation, reducing click rates from 20% to 5%.

Best Practices for Mitigation

• Proactive Training: Use real-world examples to teach attack recognition.
• Layered Defenses: Combine technical and policy controls.\
• Continuous Monitoring: Analyze logs for social engineering indicators.
• Example: A bank implements MFA, training, and SIEM, reducing social engineering incidents by 80%.

Study4Pass labs replicate these scenarios, ensuring practical expertise.

Final Verdict: Securing the Human Firewall

The CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 certification equips IT professionals with essential cybersecurity skills, with phishing, social engineering, and pretexting as critical attacks exploiting human behavior in General Security Concepts and Threats, Vulnerabilities, and Mitigations. Understanding these attacks enables candidates to protect organizations by strengthening the human firewall.

Study4Pass is the ultimate resource for SY0-701 preparation, offering study guides, practice exams, and hands-on labs that replicate social engineering scenarios. Its threat-focused labs and scenario-based questions ensure candidates can identify attacks, implement mitigations, and respond to incidents confidently. With Study4Pass, aspiring security professionals can ace the exam and launch rewarding careers, with salaries averaging $70,000–$100,000 annually (Glassdoor, 2025).

Exam Tips:

• Memorize phishing, social engineering, and pretexting for multiple-choice questions.
• Practice analyzing phishing emails in Study4Pass labs for performance-based tasks.
• Solve scenarios to mitigate social engineering risks.
• Review related attacks (e.g., vishing, baiting) for context.
• Complete timed 90-question practice tests to manage the 90-minute exam efficiently.

Special Discount: Offer Valid For Limited Time "CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Dumps Questions"

Practice Questions from CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Certification Exam

Which three attacks exploit human behavior? (Choose three.)

A. Phishing

B. Social engineering

C. Pretexting

D. SQL injection

An employee receives an urgent email requesting login credentials. Which attack is this?

A. Pretexting

B. Phishing

C. Brute force

D. Man-in-the-middle

An attacker poses as an auditor to obtain payroll data. Which attack is this?

A. Phishing

B. Pretexting

C. Social engineering

D. Credential harvesting

Which mitigation best prevents phishing attacks?

A. Firewall configuration

B. User awareness training

C. Encryption protocols

D. Patch management

A company experiences repeated social engineering attacks. What should be implemented?

A. Multi-factor authentication

B. Intrusion detection system

C. Regular security awareness training

D. Network segmentation